jump to navigation

Who’s to Blame for The Sinking Tower? 2002-11-23

Posted by clype in Glasgow, Intolerance, Scotland.
trackback

Wrangling over who is liable for problems with ‘The Glasgow Science Centre’ tower has been pushing the project further into debt. Visitor numbers have fallen since the tower was closed nine months ago when it started sinking after the 108m structure slipped out of alignment because of damage to two bearings in the base mechanism.

Losses for the year are running at 750 000 GBP after the centre posted a 1.25 million GBP shortfall in 2001.

In a statement, ‘The Science Centre’ said it was looking to finalise repairs as soon as possible, though it could not comment on legal matters.

Local Labour MSP Mr.Gordon Jackson said the tower should be fixed — to restore one of Glasgow’s biggest attractions. He said:

‘This is a wonderful asset for the city but it is no good if the visitors aren’t coming in the way they should.

‘If we need to put public money in the short term, then so be it.

‘That will have to be sorted out in due course, but to leave it like this constantly losing money or to mothball it is simply not the way forward’.

A spokesman for the centre said:

‘We are looking to finalise a course of repairs which should see the tower operational again early next year but in the light of unique technical challenges faced, it would be unwise to announce a firm re-opening date.

‘We also can’t comment at present on any legal issues surrounding the tower’.

Mr.Rod Mckenzie, a contracts specialist with ‘Harper Mcleod’, said something akin to a blame game was being played out. He said:

‘In that situation you have a complex issue of who is to blame, the extent to which different people are to blame and who is going to accept legal liability’.

Queen Elizabeth-1 formally opened the 75 million GBP science centre in 2001-07 after a troubled start for the attraction.

An estimated 1 000 visitors arrived for the attraction’s first day — but could not be charged an entrance fee because of the delay in securing a public entertainment licence.

See Also:

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Sinking Tower Opens Then Closes Again! « Clipped News - 2006-10-29

[…] Who’s to Blame for The Sinking Tower? 2002-11-23 […]

2. Sinking Tower Re-Opens « Clipped News - 2006-10-29

[…] Who’s to Blame for The Sinking Tower? 2002-11-23 […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: