Buying Up Britain 2006-06-14Posted by clype in Europe, Intolerance, Money.
‘Associated British Ports’ (‘AB Ports’) has just become the latest big UK company to pass into foreign ownership, after a consortium including investment bank ‘Goldman Sachs‘ clinched a 2 500 million GBP takeover deal.
As a result of successive sell-offs, large parts of Britain’s infrastructure are now owned by companies based elsewhere.
Many of the assets involved were originally state-owned before the wave of privatisations that took place in the 1980s.
What are the latest examples of British companies passing into foreign hands?
Both of the latest British takeover targets used to be state-owned. ‘AB Ports’, which began life as ‘The British Transport Docks Board’ in 1962, was privatised in 1982 and floated on the stock market a year later.
‘BAA’ has its roots in the old ‘British Airports Authority’, created in 1966. It was privatised 20 years later.
‘Ferrovial’ is not the only Spanish company to take an interest in corporate Britain. Last year, the ‘Abbey‘ banking chain was bought by ‘Santander‘, while mobile phone group ‘O2‘ was taken over by ‘Telefonica‘.
What other sectors of the economy have been affected?
The privatisation of gas, electricity and water in the 1980s also created opportunities for foreign firms to enter the UK market.
‘RWE’ also bought ‘Innogy’, ‘Npower’ and ‘Yorkshire Power’, while another German company, ‘E.ON‘, owns gas and electricity company ‘Powergen‘.
Among other privatised firms, ‘British Steel‘, which was sold off in 1988, has been part of the ‘Corus Group‘ since 1999, when it merged with a Dutch rival, ‘Koninklijke Hoogovens’.
Even companies that are not controlled by overseas firms may have a substantial proportion of their shares owned by foreigners. About 35 per cent of all shares in companies listed on the FTSE-100 index are in the hands of non-UK investors.
What are the political implications of all this?
Opening up Britain’s state-controlled monopolies to free-market competition was the aim of UK Prime Minister Ms.Margaret Thatcher’s ‘Conservative & Unionist Party’ government in the 1980s.
Far from opposing the consequences of this process, UK Prime Minister Mr.Tony Blair’s ‘New Labour Party’ government has defended them.
The UK Prime Minister said earlier this month, in the wake of the ‘BAA’ announcement, that foreign takeovers of British airports and utility firms should not be a political issue.
He said what was best for UK consumers was a free market with shareholders, not politicians, deciding who was the best management team.
Back in 2006-03, The UK Prime Minister defended foreign ownership of utilities, saying:
‘Liberalised energy markets and more open markets are good for business and for consumers right across Europe.’
Does the rest of Europe agree?
Not necessarily. As far as energy is concerned, Britain is arguably in the vanguard of moves by ‘The European Commission’ to shake up the sector and offer consumers more choice.
But in other areas of economic endeavour, the issue of who is allowed to own key assets has been fraught with controversy — even for governments that profess to abide by free-trade principles.
France’s ‘Veolia‘ is one European company with a stake in the British water industry, owning three companies in south-eastern England.
But the French government is happier to let its firms buy assets abroad than it is to allow foreign takeovers of French firms.
The bid speculation turned out to be unfounded, but the episode prompted Anglo-Saxon free-marketeers to ridicule France as a country where yogurt was a ‘strategic’ industry.
What about the USA? Surely Washington is more ‘laissez-faire’ than the French?
US American politicians mounted a campaign to stop ‘DPW’ taking control over management at six key US American ports, citing security fears.
US American President Mr.George Bush Jr. said their opposition sent a bad signal to Washington’s allies. He was backed by economic pundits who said it would give the impression that no Middle East company was allowed to invest in the USA.
But it was all to no avail — and ‘DPW’ eventually had to get rid of its entire USA operation in order to placate Congress.
Back in the UK, is there no limit to what Britain will sell to foreign firms?
One possibility which makes UK politicians distinctly uneasy is the prospect that Russia’s state-owned ‘Gazprom’ might enter the UK energy market.
At stake is ‘British Gas’, which was privatised in 1986 and is now owned by a company named ‘Centrica’.
The deputy chairman of ‘Gazprom’s’ board, Mr.Alexander Medvedev, has admitted ‘Centrica’ is on its list of potential take-over targets.
But Russia’s apparent willingness to use energy supplies as a political weapon — as shown by its cutting of gas supplies to Ukraine earlier this year — makes the issue problematic.
Chancellor Mr.Gordon Brown has said such a takeover might raise ‘political issues’.
The Conservatives & Unionists agree, with Shadow Trade & Industry Secretary Mr.Alan Duncan saying there should be ‘no question’ of ‘Gazprom’ being able to buy a UK utility without the company’s management being decoupled from the Russian government.
- ‘Q&A: Britain’s asset sell-off’, BBC NEWS, 2006/06/14 14:39:10