jump to navigation

“F***ing Poms” is NOT Racist 2006-12-02

Posted by clype in Intolerance, Scotland.
trackback

Calling an Englishman a ‘pom’ is not racially abusive, a court ruled 2006-12-01.

The controversial decree came as a Scotsman was cleared of using the remark towards an English police officer.

Sheriff Mr.Lindsay Foulis said it is not a derogatory term because it can be deemed only to be ‘mildly offensive’.

He said the term — which is widely used by Australians to denigrate the English — compared favourably against ‘nigger’, ‘paki’, ‘chink’ and ‘coon’.

He found Mr.William Gallagher, 39, ‘Not Guilty’ of ‘Racially Aggravated’ ‘Breach of the Peace’ after hearing how he abused Tayside Police Sergeant Mr.Rodney Wigley, 54.

As he was being charged with other offences by the English Policeman, Mr.Gallagher said:

‘Speak Scottish, you fucking pom. I fucking hate poms.’

The Police Sergeant told Perth Sheriff Court that he had never been insulted like that before and was ‘deeply upset’ by the comments. He said:

‘People often swear and shout, but never anything like that. I don’t know what sparked him off. He obviously didn’t like my accent.

‘I found it quite offensive; it was the way it was said — it was said with venom.

‘It was an obvious attack on my ethnicity; it was a term made by a Scot towards an Englishman which I perceived to be racist.’

In a bizarre courtroom exchange, The Sheriff then asked the Police Sergeant how it compared to being called a ‘bastard’ or a ‘cunt’.

The Police Sergeant said he found ‘pom’ more offensive.

Police Constable Mr.Barry Robertson told the court:

‘He was using the term as a slur that day.

‘It was not a word you come across very often.

‘It was obviously directed towards English people.’

The Procurator Fiscal Depute Mr.John Malpass described the remark as

‘… Offensive, perceived as racially motivated and conduct which should not be tolerated in any walk of life’.

He added:

‘It is not acceptable to say [that] a police officer should not be offended by that.

‘The manner and context in which it was delivered clearly proved to be racist.

‘”Fucking pom” is “Racially Aggravated” — it’s a derogatory reference to persons of “English ethnicity”.’

The court was told that the origin of the term dated back to the shipping of criminals to penal colonies in Australia in the 18th and 19th centuries.

‘Pom’ or ‘pommie’ could be derived from ‘Prisoners Of Mother England’, or may be an amalgam of ‘Immigrant’ and ‘Pomegranate’ — the colour new prisoners went in the sun after arriving in Australia.

Solicitor Mr.David Holmes, quoting ‘The Collins English Dictionary’, said ‘pom’ was described as a ‘mildly offensive’ term — often used for criticising opponents in ‘The Ashes’ cricket match between England and Australia.

The Sheriff said:

‘The sergeant and two officers were holding an accused who was being truculent. The accused says ‘speak Scottish’ and makes a reference to “Fucking Poms”.

‘If we have regard to “The Collins dictionary”, words like “nigger”, “paki”, “chink” and “coon” are all described as derogatory words.

‘They are, at the beginning of the 21st century, considered to be insulting or derogatory. That is where society has reached.

‘”Pom” or “pommie”, on the other hand, is defined as “mildly offensive”, and with the greatest of respect to Sergeant Wigley, I consider that’s a quite significant difference.

‘In the circumstances, I am not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the charge of “Breach of the Peace” has been established.’

Mr.Gallagher, of Newhouse Rd, Perth, was also cleared of four further charges — including attacking his own parents with a walking stick on 2006-11-07.

Advertisements

Comments»

1. Timothy G. - 2008-11-20

Typical of the whingeing bloody Pommie bastards. What a precious princess the cop was.

What’s the idea of sending ‘Officers of the Peace’ into situations where they aren’t even able to speak the native tongue. Typical Pommie arrogance, no wonder they have raised the ire of every nation they invaded, exploited and then oppressed for the last four hundred years. They then cast aside any nation they have decided they had squeezed all the wealth they could out of. Obviously, they aren’t quite done with Scotland yet.

The officer then has the audacity to object to the response of a local who he was bellowing accusations at in a foreign language.
What a liberty!
He’s very lucky he met a gentleman who merely registered his complaint verbally, albeit enthusiastically.

Yes indeed, it was the Pommie cop and his presumptions of Pommie superiority that should have been on trial.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: